Medical errors — causes and contradictions
https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2021-99-7-8-469-475
Abstract
Studying and improving the theory of errors of doctors has always been important, and today it has become especially relevant.
The article lists the main provisions of the advanced version of the theory of errors of doctors. The main content of the article
is devoted to four important aspects of the problem of physician errors. The article states the main contradiction of the problem
of errors in medicine. The structure of general objective and subjective causes of medical errors is shown. The main options
for doctors to experience errors that complicate doctors’ mutual understanding in this problem are formulated. For the fi rst
time, the reasons for the denial of errors by doctors are summarized. These aspects and conclusions on them are the result of
an analysis of publications on the problem of errors in medicine, repeated discussions of the problem on professional medical
sites. The content of these aspects was based on its own material on error analysis and observation from practice. The above
aspects and their conclusions need not so much to be confi rmed by special studies, but rather to refl ect on their role and place
in the problem of errors. The general objective and subjective reasons for the occurrence of medical errors are shown in
connection with their possible "guilt". Lack of experience is presented as the most common cause of medical errors. Various
option for doctors to experience errors are presented as a reason that makes it diffi cult for doctors to understand this problem.
About the Authors
M. M. MakhambetchinKazakhstan
010009, Nur-Sultan
S. V. Lokhvitskiy
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda
Y. M. Turgunov
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda
K. T. Shakeyev
Kazakhstan
100008, Karaganda
References
1. Doskin V.A., Derinova E.A., Kartoeva R.A., Sokolova M.S. Medical errors and confl icts in clinical practice. Klinicheskaja medicina. 2014;4:57--63. (in Russian)
2. Zasypkina E.V., Katrunov V.A., Kuznecova M.N. On the issue of medical errors: methodology and criteria for determination. Bjulleten’ medicinskikh Internet-konferencij. 2016; 6(1):243-247. (in Russian)
3. Dimov A.S. Physician’s anticredo from the standpoint of errologia medica: between theory and practice. Klinicheskaya medicina.2016;8:631-638. DOI:10.18821/0023-2149-2016-94-8-631-638 (in Russian)
4. Suchkova T.E., Suchkov A.V. On the terminological ambiguity of the concept of «medical error». Scientifi c-methodical electronic journal «Concept». 2017;31:996–1000. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2017/970214. htm. (in Russian)
5. Pigolkin Ju.I., Morozov Ju.E., Globa I.V. Com petence of a doctor and a lawyer in establishing a medi cal error. Aktual’nye problemy mediciny i biologii. 2018;2:58–59. doi: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10018 (in Russan)
6. Kaplun V.A. Terminological un certainty as one of the problems of medical crime investigation. Aktual’nye problemy mediciny i biologii. 2018;2:49-51. DOI: 10.24411/2587-4926-2018-10015 (in Russian)
7. Fedoseev G.B. Medical errors: character, causes, consequences, ways of prevention. Terapiya. 2018;5(23):109–115. DOI: https: //dx.doi.org/10.18565 (in Russian)
8. Fomina T.K. Attitude towards medical error in the media. Biojetika. 2009;1(3):39–41. (in Russian)
9. Makary M.A., Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 20163;353:i2139. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2139. PMID: 27143499
10. Dvoreckij L.I. Errors in the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Can they be avoided? RMZh. 2009;23:1533. (in Russian)
11. Chuchalin A.G., Sinopal’nikov A.I., Kozlov R.S., Avdeev S.N., Tyurin I.E., Rudnov V.A., Rachina S.A., Fe senko O.V. Russian Respiratory Society Interregional association on clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy Clinical guidelines on diagnosis, treatment and prevention of severe community!acquired pneumonia in adults. Pulmonologiya. 2014;(4):13–48. (in Russian). DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2014-0-4-13-48
12. Makhambetchin M.M. Theory of doctors’ mistakes — a special branch of science. Zdravoohranenie Rossijskoj Federacii. 2019;4:223–230. (in Russian). DOI: 10.18821/0044-197X-2019-63-4-214-220
13. Norman G.R., Monteiro S.D., Sherbino J., Ilgen J.S., Schmidt H.G., Mamede S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge defi cits, and dual process thinking. Acad. Med. 2017;92(1):23–30. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421.
14. Gäbler M. Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making. Wien Med. Wochenschr. 2017;167(13–14):333–342. DOI: 10.1007/s10354-017- 0570-6
15. Surry L.T., Torre D., Trowbridge R.L., Durning S.J. A mixed-methods exploration of cognitive dispositions to respond and clinical reasoning errors with multiple choice questions. BMC Med. Educ. 201823;18(1):277. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1372-2
16. Prakash S., Sladek R.M., Schuwirth L. Interventions to improve diagnostic decision making: A systematic review and meta-analysis on refl ective strategies. Med. Teach. 2019;41(5):517–524. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497786
17. Feufel M.A., Flach J.M. Medical education should teach heuristics rather than train them away. Med. Educ. 2019;53(4):334–344. DOI: 10.1111/medu.13789
18. Dumas D., Torre D.M., Durning S.J. Using relational reasoning strategies to help improve clinical reasoning practice. Acad. Med. 2018;93(5):709–714. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002114
19. Itri J.N., Patel S.H. Heuristics and cognitive error in medical imaging. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018;210(5):1097–1105. DOI: 10.2214/ AJR.17.18907
20. Lowenstein E.J., Sidlow R. Diagnostic heuristics in dermatology, part 2: metacognition and other fi xes. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018; 179(6):1270–1276. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17127
21. Royce C.S., Hayes M.M., Schwartzstein R.M. Teaching critical thinking: a case for instruction in cognitive biases to reduce diagnostic errors and improve patient safety. Acad. Med. 2019;94(2):187– 194. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518
22. Balakrishnan K., Arjmand E.M. The impact of cognitive and implicit bias on patient safety and quality. Otolaryngol. Clin. North. Am. 2019;52(1):35–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.08.016
23. Prakash S., Sladek R.M., Schuwirth L. Interventions to improve diagnostic decision making: A systematic review and meta-analysis on refl ective strategies. Med. Teach. 2019;41(5):517–524. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497786
24. Makhambetchin M.M., Turgunov E.M., Shakeev K.T. Some aspects of the doctors’ errors theory. Profi lakti cheskaja medicina. 2020;4:102–108. DOI: 10.17116/profmed202023041102 (in Russian)
25. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. M.: Jeksmo; 2018. (in Russian)
26. Makhambetchin M.M. About medical errors. Zdravoohranenie Rossijskoj Federacii. 2018; 62(6):323–30. (in Russian) DOI: 10.18821/0044-197X-2018-62-6- 323-330
Review
For citations:
Makhambetchin M.M., Lokhvitskiy S.V., Turgunov Y.M., Shakeyev K.T. Medical errors — causes and contradictions. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2021;99(7-8):469-475. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2021-99-7-8-469-475