A critical analysis of the ten-year experience of using endoscopic transpapillary interventions in an urgent surgical hospital

The aim of this work was to provide a critical analysis of the ten-year experience of using transpapillary interventions in an urgent surgical hospital with a detailed study of all groups of registered complications.

Material and methods. In the period from 2008 to 2018, 1188 retrograde endoscopic transpapillary grafts were performed on the bile ducts with dissection of the major duodenal papilla in a typical and atypical way on the basis of our clinic. The group of observed patients included 1188 patients with endoscopic papillosphincterotomy, including 839 women (70.6%) and 349 men (29.4%). The average age was 63.2 ± 1.25.

Results. During the period, 25 complications (2.1%) were revealed when performing transpapillary interventions with dissection of the major duodenal papilla: acute pancreatitis — 10 patients (0.8%); bleeding from the opening of the major duodenal papilla — 4 (0.33%), perforation 12p. intestines — 4 (0.33%), breakage of the basket cable with wedging — 1 (0.08%), cholangitis — 1 (0.08%), overlapping with a stent of the lobar duct — 1 (0.08%). The overall mortality associated with complications is 0.25%. Based on the analyzed material, the iatrogenic index was calculated. It was 0.044. After the analysis of complications, on the basis of the data obtained, we proposed an algorithm of actions when performing transpapillary interventions.

Conclusion. Based on the study, we come to the conclusion that it will not be possible to completely level the risk and avoid possible papillotomic-induced complications. In this regard, the early, preferably intraoperative diagnosis of the latter and the prompt implementation of correlating therapeutic measures are of great importance, which will undoubtedly improve the treatment results and have a positive eff ect on the outcome of the disease.

1. Shevchenko Y.L., Vetshev P.S, Stoyko O.M., Levchuk A.L. Surgical tactics for obstructive jaundice syndrome. Westnik nationalnogo honey_hirurgicheskogo center by N.I. Pirogov. 2009;4(1):10–13. (in Russian)

2. Galperin E.I. Classifi cation of the severity of obstructive jaundice. Ann.Surg. Hepatol. 2012;17(2):26–33. (in Russian)

3. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P. Classifi cation of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 63360 patients and result of surgery. Ann.Surg. 2004;240:205–213.

4. Prudkov M.I., Kovalevsky A.D., Natroshvili I.G. Endoscopic, transfi stular and transabdominal inter ventions for cholangiolithiasis. Annals of Surgical Hepatology. 2013;18(1): 42–53. (in Russian)

5. Fedorov A.G., Davydova S.V., Klimov A.E. Complications of endoscopic transpapillary interven tions and methods of their prevention and treatment: literature review. Urgentnaya honey. help. 2012;3:29–35. (in Russian)

6. Sayfutdinov I.M, Slavin L.Y. Ways of preventing complications in endoscopic transpapillary interventions. Kazan medical journal. 2016;97(91):26–31. (in Russian)

7. Deviere J. Who should receive antibiotic prophylaxis before ERCP? Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008;5:594–595.

8. Cotton P.B., Garrow D.A., Gallagher J. Risk factors for complications aft er ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009;70(1):80–88.

9. Dumonceau J.M., Andriulli A., Deviere J., Mariani A., Rigaux J., Baron T.H., Testoni P.A. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: Prophylaxis of postERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2010;6:503–515.

10. Testony P.A. Why the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis varies considerably? Factors afecting the diagnosis and the incidence of this complication. Journal of Pancreas. 2002;6:195–201.

11. Lazaraki G. Prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis: an overview. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2008;21(1):27 –38.

12. Galperin E.I., Vetshev P.S. Guide to biliary tract surgery. M.: Vidar. 2009. (in Russian)

13. Fedorov A.G., Davydova S.V., Klimov A.E. Complications of endoscopic transpapillary interventions and methods of their prevention and treatment: literature review. Urgent. med. help. 2012;3:29–35. (in Russian)

14. Lutsenko V.D., Kulikovsky V.F., Pavlova T.V., Tatyanenko T.N., Dolzhikov Retroroduodenal perforation after papillotomy — mor phological substantiation of treatment tactics. Modern high technologies. 2004;6:21–24. (in Russian)

15. Burdyukov M.S., Nechipay A.M., Yurichev I.N. Assessment of the severity of patients’ condition caused by obstructive jaundice of a tumor nature in the prognosis of the development of complications of ERCP and endoscopic retrograde biliary decompression. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology. 2010;4:78–85. (in Russian)