Treatment for acute alcoholic-alimentary pancreatitis with peritoneal syndrome

A large number of publications on surgical treatment of acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) with peritonitis indicates the importance of the problem and the need for a differentiated approach to treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the optimal treatment policy for acute alcohol-associated pancreatitis with peritonitis. The study included 114 male patients diagnosed with acute alcoholic pancreatitis and peritoneal sepsis, with an average age of 48.6 ± 6.4 years. They were admitted to the surgical departments of clinical hospitals between 2013 and 2023. The diagnosis of AAP was confi med based on clinical, laboratory, and instrumental findings. The classification of acute pancreatitis recommended by the National Clinical Guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (2015 and 2020) has been applied. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scale has been used to assess the severity and prognosis of the disease, while the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale has been used to evaluate organ failure. Based on the results, an algorithm for the treatment of acute alcoholic and alimentary pancreatitis with peritoneal syndrome has been proposed, taking into account the type of pancreatic necrosis, the extent of pancreatic damage, and the nature of fl uid accumulation. For patients with edematous pancreatitis, small-focal sterile pancreatic necrosis, and enzymatic peritonitis, percutaneous ultrasound-guided abdominal and omental drainage is recommended. In severe and moderate acute alcoholic-alimentary pancreatitis, with enzymatic peritonitis (more than 8 points on the APACHE II scale), which is manifested during diagnostic and sanitation laparoscopy by the presence of a hemorrhagic effusion and a large number of plaques of steatonecrosis on the parietal peritoneum and the large omentum, we should use an endovisual method of draining the abdominal cavity and the omentum to minimize anesthesiological and surgical aggression and to form and maintain general cavities, as well as to create good access to the pancreatic area. For patients with large-focal, infected subtotal or total pancreatic necrosis and purulent peritonitis, it is advisable to perform laparotomy, abdominalization of the pancreas, necrectomy, omentobursostomy, and drainage of purulent foci in the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal tissue.

1. Revishvili A SH., Olovyannyj V.E., Sazhin V.P., Anishchenko M.A., Kuznecov A.V., Shelina N.V. Surgical care in the Russian Federation. 2021:35. (In Russian).

2. Zatevahin I.I., Kirienko A.I., Kubyshkin, V.A., Aparcin K. Abdominalsurgery. National leadership: short edition. M., Geotar-Media. 2016. (In Russian).

3. Gallyamov E.A., Agapov M.A., Busyrev Yu.B., Gallyamov E.E., Kakotkin V.V., Allahverdieva A.R. Comparative evaluation of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis.. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2002;3:22–28. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202003122

4. Bensman V.M., Savchenko Y.P., Shcherba S.N., Malyshko V.V., Gnipel’ A.S., Golikov I.V. Surgical decisions that determine the outcome of the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2018;8:12–18. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia2018812

5. Vlasov A.P., Anaskin S.G., Vlasova T.I., Rubcov O.YU., Leshchankina N.YU., Muratova T.A., Umnov L.N. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in pancreatic necrosis: trigger agents, organ damage. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;4:21–28. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202104121

6. Korymasov E.A., Ivanov S.A., Kenarskaya M.V., Anor’ev N.I. The choice of surgical approach in the treatment of purulent complications of pancreatic necrosis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;6:10–18. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202106110

7. Fedorov A.V., Ektov V.N., Khodorkovsky M.A., Skorynin O.S. Potential of Minimally Invasive Drainage Interventions for Acute Pancreatitis. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2022;15(2):165–173. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18499/2070-478X-2022-15-2-165-173

8. Vinnik Y.S., Teplyakova O.V., Peryanova O.V., et al. Sanitation Effect of Gaseous Ozone in the Treatment of Experimental Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: Microbiological Evaluation. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2022;15(4):290–299. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18499/2070-478X-2022-15-4-290-299

9. Zheng Z., Ding Y.X., Qu Y.X., Cao F., Li F. A narrative review of acute pancreatitis and its diagnosis, pathogenetic mechanism, and management. Annals of translational medicine. 2021;9(1):69. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4802

10. Heckler M., Hackert T., Hu K., Halloran C.M., Büchler M.W., Neoptolemos J.P. Severe acute pancreatitis: surgical indications and treatment. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery. 2021;406(3):521–535. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01944-6

11. Xiao N.J., Cui T.T., Liu F., Li W. Current status of treatments of pancreatic and peripancreatic collections of acute pancreatitis. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021;13(7):633. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.633

12. Husu H.L., Valkonen M.M., Leppäniemi A.K., Mentula P.J. Occurrence and Risk Factors of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis in Intensive Care Unit–Treated Patients with Necrotizing Severe Acute Pancreatitis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2021;25(9):2289–2298. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05033-x