Morbidity, mortality, gender and clinical-anamnestic features of recurrent myocardial infarction
Abstract
Objective of the study: To determine the disease incidence and mortality from recurrent myocardial infarction (RMI) in Tomsk for twenty years (2001–2020), to carry out a gender and clinical-anamnestic analysis of MI episodes registered in 2019 and 2020.
Material and methods. Materials for the study were taken from the data of the WHO epidemiological program «Register of acute myocardial infarction». RMI meant a new ischemic attack that occurred 28 days later and in the fi rst 12 months after index acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For 20 years, 1660 cases of RMI were registered. In 2019–2020, 1748 cases of AMI were noted, including 1078 men (61.7%) and 670 women (38.3%), 148 (13.7%) patients with RMI were identifi ed. This group consisted of 97 men (65.5%) and 51 (34.5%) women. To determine the statistical signifi cance of the diff erences in nominal features, the Pearson criterion for was used. The critical level of signifi cance was taken less than 0.05 (p is the achieved level of signifi cance).
Research results. During the period analyzed, the incidence rate of RMI in Tomsk fluctuated within the range of 0.09–0.28 cases per 1000 inhabitants (for men 0.09–0.35, for women 0.06–0.23 cases per 1000 inhabitants). In dynamics, after a long decline in the incidence of RMI in Tomsk, this indicator increased again, especially among men, although it remained signifi cantly lower than in 2001. During the same period, death was registered in 562 (33.9%) patients with RMI. The mortality rate of patients with RMI did not change notably. Its level was identical in men and in women. In terms of gender, it was more common in men younger than 60 years old — 19.6%, in women it was only 3.9% (p < 0.001). Speaking about people older than 60 years, in men — 80.4%, in women — 96.1% (p < 0.001). Men underwent stenting of coronary arteries more often (51.5% and 33.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). As for the rest parameters, no signifi cant diff erences could have been identifi ed. Patients with RMI are older than patients with primary infarction and usually have comorbidities.
Conclusion. The obtained data indicate the absence of numerous gender diff erences in patients with RMI. Comparison of clinical and anamnestic parameters in patients with primary and recurrent infarction showed that patients with RMI should be considered as more diffi cult cases than those with primary infarction, both in terms of age and case history. The urgency of the RMI problem is indicated by the tendency for an increase in morbidity alongside with maintaining the level of mortality of patients at a fairly high and stable level.
About the Authors
S. A. OkruginRussian Federation
Okrugin Sergey A.
634012, Tomsk
A. N. Repin
Russian Federation
Repin Alexey N.
634012, Tomsk
References
1. Akhmedov L.A., Abdurakhmanov M.M., Boboeva M.M. Tukhtaev A.A., Ken zhaev S.R., Aliev Zh.S. Clinical manifestations of repeated acute myocardial infarction in elderly and senile men. Emergency Medicine Bulletin. 2015;1:60–63. (in Russian)
2. Oganov R.G. Prevention of cardiovascular diseases is a real way to improve the demographic situation in Russia. Cardiology. 2007;47(1):4–7. (in Russian)
3. Shopin A.N., Khovaeva Ya.B., Burdina E.N. Golovskoy B.V., Berg M.D. Prediction of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with postinfarction cardiosclerosis. Practical Medicine. 2011;1(49):135–138. (in Russian)
4. Negmajo nov U.U., Kuimov A.D. Recurrent myocardial infarction: risk factors, clinical picture, treatment. Medicine and education in Siberia [electronic scientifi c journal]. 2011;6:6. (in Russian)
5. Gorbunova N., Sedykh D., Bryukhanova I., Krestova O., Vedernikova A. Recurrent myocardial infarction: risk factors and prevention. Doctor. 2017;9:84–86. (In Russian)]. (in Russian)
6. Sorenzen R., Gislason G., Fosbol E., Rasmussen S., Cober L., Madsen J.K., Torp-Pedersen C., Abildstrom S.Z. Initation and persistence with clopidogrel treatment after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide study. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008;66:875–884. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03284.x
7. Novikova R.A., Alekseychik S.E., Goncharik T.A. Alekseychik D.S., Sankovich E.V. Recurrent myocardial infarction, the reasons for its development, the diffi culties of diagnosis and prevention. Emergency Medicine. 2017;2(6):229–234. (in Russian). ID: 29120607
8. Shulaev A.V., Muradimova Z.R., Marapov D.I., Zakirov I.K., Mazitov M.R. Outcomes of repeated myocardial infarction. Practical Medicine. 2016;2(4):142–144. (in Russian)
9. Nakatani D., Sakata Y., Suna S., Usami M., Matsumoto S., Shimizu M., Sumitsuji S., Kawano S., Ueda Y., Hamasaki T., Sato H., Nanto S., Hori M., Komuro I. Osaka Coronary Insuffi cience Study (OACIS) Investigators. Incidence, predictors, and subsequent mortality risk of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients following discharge for acute myocardial infarction. Circ. J. 2013;77(2):439– 446. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-11-1059
10. Smorodskaya I.V., Boytsov S.A. Recurrent myocardial infarction: assessment, risks, prevention. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;6(146):139–145. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2017-6-139-145
11. Barbarash O.L., Sedykh D.Yu., Gorbunova E.V. The main factors that determine the risk of developing recurrent myocardial infarction. Heart: a journal for medical practitioners. 2017;16(1):26–31. (in Russian). DOI: 10.18087/rhj. 2017.1.2280
12. Betig Z., Mazur N.A., Blizzard V.I. Comparative data on myocardial infarction registers in Moscow and Berlin. In the book: Epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases. Ed. I.G. Shkhvatsabay. Moscow: Meditsina, 1977:166– 193. (in Russian)
13. Kryuchkov D.V., Artamonova G.V. Primary and recurrent myocardial infarction: diff erences in long-term patient survival. Complex problems of cardiovascular diseases. 2015;3:47– 52. (in Russian)
14. Shishkina E.A., Khlynova O.V., Tuev A.V., Novikova I.A., Nekrutenko L.A. Pos sibilities of predicting recurrent myocardial infarction in patients of working age. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(8);69–74. (in Russian). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3909
15. Kuzheleva E.A., Garganeeva A.A., Borel K.N., Tukish O.V. The eff ect of drug therapy on the clinical course of the postinfarction period and the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction, according to the population register. Medicine in Kuzbass. 2014;13(4):37–42. (in Russian)
16. Garganeeva A.A., Okrugin S.A., Borel K.N., Parshin E.A. Infl uence of the demographic situation on the epidemiology of acute coronary pathology in the urban population of the West Siberian region. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2014;11(115):62–66. (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Okrugin S.A., Repin A.N. Morbidity, mortality, gender and clinical-anamnestic features of recurrent myocardial infarction. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2021;99(11-12):627-631. (In Russ.)