Preview

Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal)

Advanced search

Efficiency of combined indirect revascularization in patients with critical low extremities

https://doi.org/10.34651/0023-2149-2020-98-1-49-55

Abstract

Goal. Evaluation of the effectiveness of combined indirect revascularization in the treatment of critical ischemia in patients with occlusive stenotic lesions of the arteries of the foot, lower leg and thigh.
Material and methods. The analysis of the comprehensive examination and treatment of 40 patients with chronic critical ischemia of the lower extremities of stage III as a result of atherosclerotic lesions of the femoral-popliteal and ankle-foot segments was carried out. Patients according to the treatment technology were divided into 2 statistically homogeneous groups of 20 people each. Patients in the first group underwent standard lumbar sympathectomy, and patients in the second group underwent combined treatment.At the first stage, sympathectomy was performed, and at the second stage, after 2–3 months, bone marrow autologous cells were transplanted with the total volume of 48 ml from 10 points along the inner and from 10 points along the outer surface of the thigh and lower leg and from 4 points on the foot in each intertarsal space. Bone marrow cells were harvested from the ilium. The effectiveness of treatment after 7 days, 6 and 12 months was evaluated by the dynamics of the rheographic, ankle-brachial, photoplethysmographic indices, the distance of painless walking, and after 6 and 12 months - by the clinical status and quality of the life patients.
Results. In patients of the second group, compared with the first after 12 months, the arterial blood flow and microcirculation were significantly higher: rheographic index — 0.26, ankle-brachial index — 0.2, photoplethysmographic — 7.1%, painless walking distance — by 32 m. The use of combined treatment made it possible to achieve clinical status in the form of moderate and minimal improvement after 6 months in 19 (95%), and after 12 months in 18 (90%) patients, whereas after performing standard sympathectomy in 16 (80%) and in 10 (50%) patients, respectively.In the remote period, after 12 months, the limb was saved in the second group in all 20 (100%), and in the first group in 17 (85%) patients. In patients of the second group compared with the first after 12 months, a statistically significant increase in the physical component of health by 8.2% was revealed, and the mental component of health by 5.1%.
Conclusion. Combined indirect revascularization can normalize microcirculation in the ischemic limb and achieve positive dynamics of the disease.

About the Authors

A. Yu. Orlova
Kursk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
305041, Kursk


B. S. Sukovatykh
Kursk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris S. Sukovatykh — MD, PhD, DSc, prof., head of the Department of general surgery

305041, Kursk


E. B. Artyushkova
Kursk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
305041, Kursk


M. B. Sukovatykh
Kursk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
305041, Kursk


I. V. Larina
Kursk State Medical University of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
305041, Kursk


References

1. Gavrilenko A.V., Oleynik E.M. The effectiveness of the use of genetic engineering constructs VEGF165 in the complex treatment of chronic lower limb ischemia. Annaly khirurgii. 2015;6:5-9. (in Russian)

2. Vasil’chenko E.M., Zoloev G.K. Survival rates for patients with peripheral artery disease of non-diabetic origin after amputation of the lower extremities. Population study. Annaly khirurgii. 2012;3:45–48. (in Russian)

3. Sapelkin S.V., Kuznetsov M.R. Conservative treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease: possibilities and existing problems. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2016;22(4):169–75. (in Russian)

4. Petukhov A.V. Indirect revascularization of the lower extremities in patients with distal PAD. Zhurnal GrGMU. 2010;2:141–5. (in Russian)

5. Kosaev Dzh.V., Budagov I.K., Namazov I.L. Clinical and pathogenetic aspects of the operation of revascularizing osteotrepanation in patients with critical lower limb ischemia. Nauchno-meditsinskiy zhurnal «Vestnik Avitsenny». 2013;4:19–24. (in Russian)

6. Kokhan E.P., Pinchuk O.V. Reflections about the lumbar sympathectomy. Years and practice. To the 90th anniversary of the using the method in Russia. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgi. 2017;23(2): 186–190. (in Russian)

7. Zechlinski J.J., Hieb R.A. Lumbar sympathetic neurolysis: how to and when to use? Tech. VascInterv. Radiol. 2016;19(2):163–8.

8. Shevchenko Yu.L., Matveev S.A., Solov’ev I.A. The role of angiogenesis in normal and pathological conditions. Vestnik Rossiyskoy voenno-meditsinskoy akademii. 2001;5(1):92–97. (in Russian)

9. Fadini G.P., Agostini C., Avogaro A. Autologous stem cell therapy for peripheral arterial disease meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209(1):10–7.

10. Onodera R., Teramukai S., Tanaka S. Bone marrow mononuclear cells versus G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells for treatment of lower limb ASO: pooled analysis for long-term prognosis. Bone. Marrow. Transplant. 2011;46(2):278–84.

11. Stolzing A, Jones E, McGonagle D, Scutt A. Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: consequences for cell therapies. Mech. Ageing. Dev. 2008;129(3):163–73.

12. Raval Z., Losordo D.W. Cell therapy of peripheral arterial disease: from experimental fi ndings to clinical trials. Circ. Res. 2013;112 (9):1288–302.

13. Sukovatykh B.S., Itinson A.I., Knyazev V.V., Magomedalieva K.S., Savchuk O.F. Diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities of chemical desympathization in patients with chronic obliterating diseases of lower limb arteries. Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2008;14 (3):32–36. (in Russian)

14. Rutherford R.B., Baker J.D., Ernst C., Jonhston K.W., Porter J.M., Ahn S., Lones D.N. Recommended standarts for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version. J. Vasc. Surg. 1997;26: 516–38.

15. National guidelines for the management of patients with diseases of the arteries of the lower extremities. Moscow, 2013. (in Russian)

16. Amirdzhanova V.N., Goryachev D.V., Korshunov N.I., Rebrov A.P., Sorotskaya V.N. Population quality of life indicators according to the SF-36 questionnaire (the results of the “MIRAGE” multicenter study of quality of life) Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2008;1: 36–48. (in Russian)

17. Lawall H., Bramlage P., Amann B. Stem cell and progenitor cell therapy in peripheral artery disease. A critical appraisal. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;103(4):696–709.

18. Wahlberg Eric. Angiogenesis and arteriogenesis in limb ischemia. J. Vasc. Surg. 2006;38(1):198–203.

19. Gabr H., Hedayet A., Imam U., Nasser M. Limb salvage using intramuscular injection of unfracti onated autolo-gous bone marrow mononuclear cells in critical limb ischemia: a prospective pilot clinical trial. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2011;9(3):197–202.


Review

For citations:


Orlova A.Yu., Sukovatykh B.S., Artyushkova E.B., Sukovatykh M.B., Larina I.V. Efficiency of combined indirect revascularization in patients with critical low extremities. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2020;98(1):49-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34651/0023-2149-2020-98-1-49-55

Views: 499


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0023-2149 (Print)
ISSN 2412-1339 (Online)