Polypragmasia among the elderly with endocrine diseases in outpatient practice
https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2025-103-6-450-456
Abstract
The increase in life expectancy worldwide is accompanied by an increase in polymorbidity and polypragmasis. Elderly patients with endocrine diseases are at particular risk of polypragmasis, which involves the use of potentially irrational therapy (PIT) that increases the risks of adverse events (AEs), hospitalizations and mortality. Therefore, it is increasingly important to assess the prevalence of PIT use among older adults with endocrine disease. Aim. To assess the incidence of polypragmancy and analyze medication prescriptions for PIT using Beers 2023 criteria among elderly persons with endocrine disease in outpatient medical care. Material and methods. An observational one-stage multicenter single-sample uncontrolled study was conducted on the basis of the Grozny Republican Endocrinology Dispensary and other health care facilities of the Chechen Republic. Performed a review of 2023 outpatient medical records of patients aged 65 years and older for polypragmasy and PIT according to Beers 2023 criteria. Results. The study included 221 patients (58 men and 163 women), the median age was 68 years [66; 71]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus with multiple complications prevailed in the morbidity structure. When BMI was analyzed, grade 1 obesity was found in 37.6% of cases, with a statistically signifi cant higher prevalence in women than in men (72.4% vs 50.0%; p < 0.003, Fisher’s exact test). The median number of MP taken by patients was 4 [3; 5]. Prescription of 5 or more LS was observed in 110 patients (49.8%). When performing a comparative analysis of patients with and without polypragmasia, a statistically signifi cant diff erence by age was found (p < 0.017, Mann–Whitney test). The frequency of PIT prescription, which is represented by sulfonylurea derivatives, was 74/221 (33.5%). The frequency of prescription of SGLT-2 inhibitors, which should be used with caution according to the updated Beers criteria, was 50/221 (22.6%). No cases of AEs were registered against the background of PIT administration. Conclusion. Elderly patients with endocrine diseases are at high risk of polypragmasy and PIT prescribing. The use of Beers criteria will allow eff ective monitoring of the therapy and prevent the development of AEs. If there is no possibility of withdrawal of the drug or selection of an analog, the need for active monitoring of patients for the detection of AEs becomes obvious.
About the Authors
E. A. TroshinaRussian Federation
Ekaterina A. Troshina — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Institute of Clinical Endocrinology
Moscow
eLibrary SPIN: 8821- 8990
Z.-SH. R. Umarkhadzhieva
Russian Federation
Zaina-SHarifa R. Umarkhadzhieva — Candidate of Medical Sciences
Moscow
eLibrary SPIN: 2433-4876
U. S. Isaeva
Russian Federation
V. O. Bogdanova
Russian Federation
Valeriya O. Bogdanova — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Healthcare Organization and Public Health; Chief Specialist of the Department of Organizational and Methodological Support for the Activities of the Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care
Moscow
eLibrary SPIN: 9620-1989
A. R. Elfimova
Russian Federation
Alina R. Elfimova — Candidate of Medical Sciences
Moscow
eLibrary SPIN: 9617-7460
References
1. Colleluori G., Villareal D.T. Aging, obesity, sarcopenia and the eff ect of diet and exercise intervention. Exp. Gerontol. 2021;155:111561. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111561
2. Qato DM., Alexander GC., Conti RM., Johnson M., Schumm P., Lindau S.T. Use of prescription and over-the-counter medications and dietary supplements among older adults in the United States. JAMA. 2008;300(24):2867–2878
3. Saraf AA., Petersen AW., Simmons SF. et al. Medications associated with geriatric syndromes and their prevalence in older hospitalized adults discharged to skilled nursing facilities. J. Hosp. Med. 2016;11(10):694–700.
4. By the 2023 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2023;71(7):2052–2081. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18372
5. Sy`chev D.A., Danilina K.S., Golovina O.V. Chastota naznacheniya potencial`no ne rekomendovanny`x preparatov (po kriteriyam Birsa) pozhily`m pacientam, naxodyashhimsya v terapevticheskix otdeleniyax mnogoprofi l`nogo stacionara. Therapeutic archive. 2015;87(1):27– 30. (In Russian]. DOI: 10.17116/terarkh201587127-30.
6. Alfyorova V.I., Mustafi na S.V. Rasprostranennost` ozhireniya vo vzrosloj populyacii rossijskoj federacii (obzor literatury`). Obesity and metabolism. 2022;19(1):96–105. (In Russian). DOI: 10.14341/omet12809.
7. Kim J., Parish A.L. Polypharmacy and Medication Management in Older Adults. Nurs. Clin. North Am. 2017;52(3):457–468.
8. Panova E.A., Serov V.A., Shutov A.M., Bakumceva N.N., Kuzovenkova M.Yu. Polipragmaziya u ambulatorny`x pacientov pozhilogo vozrasta. Ulyanovsk Medical and Biological Journal. 2019;(2):16–22. (In Russian). DOI: 10.34014/2227-1848-2019-2-16
9. Remelli F., Ceresini MG., Trevisan C., Noale M., Volpato S. Prevalence and impact of polypharmacy in older patients with type 2 diabetes. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022;34(9):1969–1983. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02165-1
10. Xing X.X., Zhu C., Liang H.Y. et al. Associations Between Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Adverse Health Outcomes in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2019;53(10):1005–1019. DOI: 10.1177/1060028019853069
11. Oliveira R.M.A.F., Gorzoni M.L., Rosa R.F. Potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized elderly patients. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992). 2022;68(6):797–801. Published 2022 Jun 24. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220015
12. Gagnon M.E., Sirois C., Simard M., Roux B., Plante C. Potentially inappropriate medications in older individuals with diabetes: A population-based study in Quebec, Canada. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020;14(5):529–537. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.03.003
13. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group [published correction appears in Lancet 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):602. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–853.
14. Svěcený J., Jirušková J., Hrach K., Radovnická L., Laštůvka J. Deriváty sulfonylurey a riziko hypoglykemie u diabetiků 2. typu [Sulfonylurea derivatives and risk of hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetic patients]. Vnitr. Lek. 2020;66(6):35–42.
15. Ivanova SM, Popova EK, Matveeva RE, et al. Otsenka rasprostranennosti izbytochnoi massy tela i abdominal’nogo ozhireniya sredi sotrudnikov SVFU respubliki Sakha (Yakutiya). Sinergiya nauk. 2019;36:392–403. (In Russian).
16. Shamov I.A, Akhmedov I.G, Bagomedova N.V, Omarova K.G. Prevalence of obesity in the Republic of Daghestan. Problems of Endocrinology. 2006;52(3):26– 30. (In Russian) DOI: 10.14341/probl200652326-30.
Review
For citations:
Troshina E.A., Umarkhadzhieva Z.R., Isaeva U.S., Bogdanova V.O., Elfimova A.R. Polypragmasia among the elderly with endocrine diseases in outpatient practice. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2025;103(6):450-456. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2025-103-6-450-456
































